Greenpeace seeks new trial in $345M Dakota Access Pipeline lawsuit

Aberdeen News
Greenpeace is requesting a new trial after a $345 million judgment against them in a lawsuit brought by the Dakota Access Pipeline developer.

Summary

Greenpeace is challenging a $345 million judgment awarded to Energy Transfer, the developer of the Dakota Access Pipeline, following a lawsuit alleging the environmental group incited illegal acts during 2016-2017 protests. Greenpeace claims errors in jury instructions, irrelevant evidence presented by Energy Transfer, and a biased jury pool warrant a new trial. They argue the initial jury award of $667 million, later reduced by the judge to $345 million, incorrectly assumes full responsibility for damages caused by the protests.

Greenpeace seeks to move the trial to Cass County, believing a more impartial jury pool exists there, away from the direct impact of the pipeline protests and the energy industry's influence. They also filed a separate lawsuit in the Netherlands, alleging Energy Transfer is misusing the U.S. legal system. Energy Transfer defends the verdict and may appeal the reduction in the award.

The judge has ruled Greenpeace won't have to pay the judgment immediately but may require a bond of up to $25 million during the appeals process, a request Greenpeace is challenging. The North Dakota Supreme Court is currently considering related appeals regarding the trial location and the Dutch lawsuit.

(Source:Aberdeen News)

WBRZ

$5M lawsuit claims Disney's California theme parks illegally collect facial recognition data

CP24 Toronto

Judge approves class action lawsuit launched by Quebec TV personality

The Bradenton Times

Maryland reaches $4.1M settlement with homebuilder in sediment pollution case

Tekedia

Tether Invests on LemFi to Accelerate Stablecoin Settlement Flow in Africa and Asia

Headtopics

President Trump, Family, and Businesses Shielded from Pending Tax Audits as Part of DOJ Settlement

Bitcoin News

Evernorth Highlights XRP’s ‘Actual Story’ Beyond JPMorgan Settlement Attention

Punch

SEC fixes June 1 for T+1 settlement cycle transition

Firstpost

Why is Trump’s new IRS settlement triggering allegations of ‘self-dealing’?

Syracuse Ny Local News

Government to permanently drop tax claims against Trump family as part of lawsuit settlement

USA TODAY

Disney sued over facial recognition at California theme parks

New York Post

Disneyland targeted in class-action lawsuit claiming new program is violating guests' privacy

Bangor Daily News

Journalists sue tech giants over 'stolen' voices for AI training

The Mercury News

Disneyland hit with $5 million lawsuit over use of facial recognition technology

Devdiscourse

UPDATE 4-Takeda engaged in antitrust scheme to delay generic constipation drug, US jury finds

The Japan Times

Takeda engaged in antitrust scheme to delay generic constipation drug: U.S. jury