Deloitte warns of dangerous “blind spot” in tokenized settlement that will make market manipulation nearly impossible to stop

Plato Data Intelligence
Deloitte warns that faster settlement (T+0) could create a “blind spot” enabling market manipulation if transparency isn't prioritized alongside speed.

Summary

Deloitte's 2026 outlook highlights the potential risks and opportunities of T+0 settlement – settling trades the same day – particularly as it relates to tokenized securities and stablecoins. While T+0 promises faster asset movement and clearer records, it also compresses the time available to detect errors and manipulation. The report emphasizes that successful implementation hinges on pilot programs that prioritize transparency and auditability, rather than solely focusing on speed.

The key concern is that reduced reporting burdens, intended to streamline processes, could inadvertently increase opacity, creating a “blind spot” where market manipulation could go unnoticed. Deloitte suggests that increased focus on compliance, surveillance, and cybersecurity is crucial to mitigate these risks. The firm believes early traction for tokenization will likely be in collateral workflows due to the intraday nature of these commitments.

Ultimately, T+0 serves as a stress test for market infrastructure, determining whether tokenization will become a scalable, integral part of the financial system or remain a limited experiment. The outcome depends on whether pilots demonstrate improved settlement and collateral workflows *without* sacrificing transparency, and whether regulators can effectively oversee the evolving landscape.

(Source:Plato Data Intelligence)

The Motley Fool Australia

KFC owner Collins Foods shares sliding today on class action news

PerthNow

Qantas makes $105m settlement in COVID-19 flight credit class action

Fox Business

Costco sued by customer seeking refunds for tariff payments

TechRadar

PlayStation users in the UK could be collectively awarded billions in compensation for 'excessive and unfair' PlayStation Store charges in class-action lawsuit against Sony

Polygon

Sony hit with $2.67 billion lawsuit over 'excessive and unfair' digital download charges

TechCrunch

A writer is suing Grammarly for turning her and other authors into ‘AI editors’ without consent

New York Post

Costco shopper sues retailer for tariff refunds after Trump import taxes overruled

Siliconrepublic.com

Grammarly drops AI impersonation tool after class action lawsuit

International Business Times

Grammarly Faces $5M Lawsuit After AI 'Expert Review' Feature Used Writers' Names Without Permission

Gizmodo

Grammarly Allegedly ‘Misappropriated’ Names of Journalists, Says Class Action Suit

BayToday

Ontario Superior Court approves class-action suit against Barrick

WIRED

Grammarly Is Facing a Class Action Lawsuit Over Its AI ‘Expert Review’ Feature

Global News

Privacy watchdog ‘monitoring’ U.S. auto insurance phone tracking lawsuit

Ventura County Star

California Tinder users may qualify for payments in $60.5M settlement

Raleigh News & Observer

NC attorney general blasts antitrust settlement over Ticketmaster practices