Starbucks Sued Over “100% Ethical” Coffee Claims Amid Forced Labor Reports - USA Herald
Summary
Starbucks faces a class action lawsuit alleging deceptive marketing practices regarding its “100% ethically sourced” coffee. Plaintiffs Jennifer Williams and David Strauss claim they paid a premium for Starbucks coffee based on these representations, but evidence suggests labor violations and unsafe conditions persist within the company’s supply chain in countries like Brazil, China, Guatemala, and Mexico. The lawsuit cites reports of forced labor, excessive hours, and hazardous working conditions at farms certified under Starbucks’ C.A.F.E. Practices program.
Plaintiffs also allege Starbucks failed to disclose the presence of volatile organic compounds, including benzene and methylene chloride, in its decaffeinated coffee products. They seek monetary damages, restitution, and an end to the allegedly misleading marketing. Starbucks denies the allegations, asserting the lawsuit mischaracterizes its sourcing practices and the integrity of its C.A.F.E. certification.
This lawsuit follows previous accusations of labor exploitation at Starbucks’ supplier farms, including claims of debt bondage and coercive working conditions. The plaintiffs are represented by Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, Richman Law and Policy, and the case is currently underway in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington.
(Source:USA Herald)