UK settlement in 10 years: Why Indians and other migrants oppose the rule
Proposed changes to UK immigration rules would double the qualifying period for permanent settlement to 10 years, sparking opposition from migrants and rights groups.Summary
The UK Home Office plans to increase the qualifying period for Indefinite Leave to Remain (ILR), or permanent settlement, from five to ten years, prompting criticism from migrants, particularly Indians, and organizations like the Work Rights Centre. The government, led by Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood, argues this change is part of an effort to reduce net migration. Opponents contend the extended wait will increase exploitation, financial strain, and create deeper divisions in the labor market, disproportionately affecting low-to-middle earners, refugees, and care workers.
The proposed “earned settlement model” introduces variable eligibility based on factors like income and occupation, potentially fast-tracking some while extending the wait for others, including care workers who could face a 15-year wait. The changes are estimated to impact 1.6 million people. Migrants express feelings of betrayal and uncertainty, citing the impact on their mental health and long-term planning.
The Work Rights Centre is urging individuals to participate in the public consultation, which runs until February 2026, and is compiling case studies to highlight the potential negative consequences. Legal experts suggest that while challenges are possible, they face significant hurdles, and collective advocacy may be more effective than litigation. The changes could particularly affect Indian nationals, a large group of skilled workers and migrants in the UK, increasing costs and prolonging uncertainty.
(Source：Business Standard)