Binance cannot force arbitration in crypto loss claims, says US judge

The Economic Times
A US judge ruled Binance must face lawsuits from customers claiming losses on unregistered tokens, rejecting their attempt to enforce arbitration.

Summary

A federal judge in Manhattan rejected Binance's attempt to force customers into arbitration regarding claims that the exchange illegally sold unregistered tokens, leading to significant losses. Judge Andrew Carter ruled that customers could pursue claims originating before February 20, 2019, in court because Binance failed to adequately inform them about changes to its terms of use that introduced arbitration and waived class action rights. The judge found no evidence Binance actively announced the arbitration provision or clearly indicated its location within the terms of use, deeming the class-action waiver ambiguous and unenforceable.

The lawsuit was initially dismissed in 2022 but was revived by a federal appeals court. Customers allege Binance failed to disclose the substantial risks associated with purchasing seven specific tokens – ELF, EOS, FUN, ICX, OMG, QSP, and TRX – violating federal and state securities laws. They seek to recover their investments.

Binance founder Changpeng Zhao is also named as a defendant in the case. Lawyers for Binance and Zhao have not yet responded to requests for comment. The ruling highlights a preference among some defendants for arbitration due to its potential for confidentiality, difficulty in evidence gathering, and lower costs, but Judge Carter’s decision allows the plaintiffs to proceed with their claims in a public court setting.

(Source:The Economic Times)

The Motley Fool Australia

KFC owner Collins Foods shares sliding today on class action news

PerthNow

Qantas makes $105m settlement in COVID-19 flight credit class action

Fox Business

Costco sued by customer seeking refunds for tariff payments

TechRadar

PlayStation users in the UK could be collectively awarded billions in compensation for 'excessive and unfair' PlayStation Store charges in class-action lawsuit against Sony

Polygon

Sony hit with $2.67 billion lawsuit over 'excessive and unfair' digital download charges

TechCrunch

A writer is suing Grammarly for turning her and other authors into ‘AI editors’ without consent

New York Post

Costco shopper sues retailer for tariff refunds after Trump import taxes overruled

Siliconrepublic.com

Grammarly drops AI impersonation tool after class action lawsuit

International Business Times

Grammarly Faces $5M Lawsuit After AI 'Expert Review' Feature Used Writers' Names Without Permission

Gizmodo

Grammarly Allegedly ‘Misappropriated’ Names of Journalists, Says Class Action Suit

BayToday

Ontario Superior Court approves class-action suit against Barrick

WIRED

Grammarly Is Facing a Class Action Lawsuit Over Its AI ‘Expert Review’ Feature

Global News

Privacy watchdog ‘monitoring’ U.S. auto insurance phone tracking lawsuit

Ventura County Star

California Tinder users may qualify for payments in $60.5M settlement

Raleigh News & Observer

NC attorney general blasts antitrust settlement over Ticketmaster practices