Subhash Chandra's 99.97% haircut explained: What it means in the Rs 6.5-crore settlement

Et Now
The NCLT approved a Rs 6.5 crore repayment plan for Subhash Chandra, which critics claim represents a 99.97% haircut on admitted claims of Rs 22,006.57 crore.

Summary

The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has approved a repayment proposal under which Zee Group founder Subhash Chandra will pay creditors just Rs 6.5 crore. This decision has sparked a heated debate because the repayment amount appears to be a 99.97% haircut on admitted creditor claims of Rs 22,006.57 crore, meaning creditors would recover only about 0.03 per cent of their total claims. The term "haircut" is not defined under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The controversy arose because the headline figure compares the admitted claims against the payout, suggesting nearly the entire debt has vanished. However, the NCLT noted that these figures do not represent the entire universe of recoveries. The tribunal rejected objections from lenders, including LIC Housing Finance, which argued that the recovery rate of 0.028 per cent for its admitted claim of Rs 1,322.39 crore was too meagre. The NCLT ruled that the dissenting creditors collectively represented less than 20 per cent of the total voting share, while the plan had been approved by the required 80.81 per cent. The judgment emphasized that the resolution professional's valuation revealed Chandra's personal estate was valued far below the offered amount, and that dissenting creditors were unlikely to recover more by rejecting the plan. Furthermore, the tribunal clarified that under Section 115 of the IBC, an approved repayment structure becomes binding on all creditors, irrespective of whether they voted for or against it.

(Source:Et Now)

Australian Financial Review

McDonald’s class action: Justice Michael Lee orders AI use to cut legal costs in $100 million underpayment case

PerthNow

Thousands of Aussies to share in $249 million settlement after superannuation class action

PerthNow

Commonwealth Bank, Colonial First State and Avanteos settle $249m class action

Et Now

Subhash Chandra's 99.97% haircut explained: What it means in the Rs 6.5-crore settlement

Ellwood City Ledger

Why Pa.'s $516M from Meta suit is less valuable than 2 hours a day

Mint

Setback for Anthropic? Sony, Warner Chappell file lawsuit against AI firm, accusing it of intellectual property theft

Hindustan Times

HC orders Orris MD’s release after settlement with Godrej Properties | Mumbai news

Hoodline

Rhode Island Second-Home Tax Lawsuit Could Reshape NYC's Pied-à-Terre Fight

Google News

EPFO 3.0: Centralised database, UPI and ATM withdrawal options, quicker settlement — Changes for subscribers, explained

Cbs News

What Meta's massive $17 billion social media addiction settlement means for your family

Fortune

Former White House teleprompter operator must turn over more than $100,000 in profits and pay a $65,000 fine in insider trading settlement | Fortune

Bkreader

Settlement Forces Zillow & Redfin to Compete Again

Breakingbelizenews

Have you seen them? Credit Settlement Agency requests public assistance

Mint

Meta’s $18 bn child safety settlement comes with a catch: Why TikTok, YouTube, Snapchat’s actions matter | Explained

CNET

Equifax Class Action: Last Chance to Claim Part of the $2.2M Settlement