Former OHL, WHL players can join court-approved claims over alleged abuse

Tsn (The Sports Network)
Former OHL and WHL players can now opt into a court-approved process to seek compensation for alleged abuse, hazing, and bullying, with a deadline of April 6, 2027.

Summary

Former major junior hockey players who allege they were abused, hazed, or bullied while playing in the Ontario Hockey League (OHL) or Western Hockey League (WHL) can now join a court-approved legal process to seek financial compensation from their former teams, their leagues, and the Canadian Hockey League (CHL). According to a notice published by Koskie Minsky LLP, the Toronto law firm representing plaintiffs, players have until April 6, 2027, to opt in. Eligible players include anyone who participated with an OHL or WHL team since 1975 and claims to have experienced such mistreatment, and participants will have their identities protected from public disclosure.

The process stems from litigation launched six years ago by former players Daniel Carcillo and Garrett Taylor, who filed a proposed class action alleging decades of ritualized hazing, racism, homophobia, sexual abuse, and physical violence in major junior hockey, and accusing hockey organizations of failing to prevent or respond to this conduct. In February 2023, Ontario Superior Court Justice Paul Perell declined to certify the case as a class action, finding it too complex given the number of teams, provinces, and decades involved. However, he acknowledged substantial evidence of a pervasive culture of "bullying, harassment, hazing, and criminal conduct" in major junior hockey. Rather than ending the case, Perell directed lawyers to create an alternative mechanism for players to pursue claims.

Under the new process, players who opt in will be grouped with others who played for the same team, and Koskie Minsky will file a "joinder action" on their behalf, naming the team, its league, and the CHL as defendants in Ontario Superior Court. Unlike a certified class action, players must affirmatively opt in; those who do not may still pursue individual lawsuits, though limitation periods could affect their claims. Perell's findings were partly supported by an independent review panel commissioned by the CHL after the lawsuit was filed in 2020, which concluded that off-ice misconduct and an entrenched code of silence were widespread across the leagues. Former Quebec Maritimes Junior Hockey League (QMJHL) players are not part of this opt-in process due to a separate ongoing class action, though QMJHL players who have opted out of that case may still join this one.

(Source:Tsn (The Sports Network))

Crypto News

Ledger sued for $500M over alleged data breach and crypto theft

Chicago Tribune

Judge blocks President Trump’s new bid to curb birthright citizenship, citing Supreme Court precedent

Deadline

NY Times Rips Trump's DOJ For Backing AI Companies In Class Action Suit

The Boston Globe

Musicians sue AI music company Suno for imitating their voices

WIS10

Federal class-action lawsuit filed against Flock Safety

The Guardian

Uber drivers launch European class action over ‘soulless’ and ‘scary’ AI algorithm

Koreajoongangdaily Joins News

Coupang data breach lawsuit faces U.S. court jurisdiction battle

Insurance Journal

Apple to Pay Virginia Employee $150K in Religious Accommodation Settlement

Newswise

FTC Lawsuit Against Amazon Raises Questions About Advertising Costs, Competition and Consumer Impact: UMD Expert Available | Newswise

Wtvc

Whistleblower says Meta’s $18B settlement falls short of protecting kids’ lives

Upper Michigan's Source

Marquette County Board forms opioid task force to refine settlement disbursement

The Hollywood Reporter

Country Star Jason Isbell...

Billboard

Jason Isbell Files Class Action Lawsuit Claiming Suno Coded AI to ‘Extract Musicians’ Identities’

Fortune

Once a champion for physical media, Sony is now telling PlayStation customers they don’t actually own the digital video games they paid $70 for | Fortune

The Aryavarth Express - Your Own English Daily New

Subhash Chandra Insolvency: ₹22,006 Crore Claims vs ₹6.5 Crore Settlement