Payment Towards Corporate Guarantee Settlement Allowable as Deductible Business Expenditure u/s 37(1): ITAT [Read Order]

Taxscan
The ITAT ruled that a payment for settling a corporate guarantee is deductible as a business expense under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act.

Summary

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) addressed whether a payment made towards settling a corporate guarantee could be considered a deductible business expenditure under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The case involved Escorts Limited, which provided a guarantee to a Korean supplier (L.S. Cables, Korea) for credit extended to its US subsidiary (Farmtrac North America LLC). When the subsidiary defaulted, the guarantee was invoked, leading to arbitration and a settlement of USD 7.17 million. Escorts claimed the settlement payment as a business expense, but the Assessing Officer (AO) and Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (CIT(A)) disallowed it, arguing it wasn’t exclusively for business purposes.

Escorts argued the guarantee was given in the ordinary course of business to support its subsidiary and promote its brand in the US. They cited precedents supporting the allowance of similar claims. The Revenue countered that a valid guarantee didn’t exist due to a lack of countersignature and questioned the expenditure’s connection to Escorts’ business, noting the subsidiary was only 75% owned.

The ITAT ruled in favor of Escorts, stating the guarantee’s validity was established through arbitration and High Court proceedings. The tribunal emphasized that the tax department shouldn’t second-guess business decisions and that once a guarantee is given, the resulting liability is a legitimate business obligation. Consequently, the disallowance of Rs. 47.64 crores was reversed, allowing Escorts to deduct the settlement payment as a business expense.

(Source:Taxscan)

Toronto Sun

Pornhub owner Aylo agrees to proposed US$120-million class-action settlement

MacRumors

Siri AI Settlement: Apple Won't Begin Paying Customers Until Next Year

The Straits Times

Amazon’s new user agreement seeks to curb class-action suits

New York Post

Exclusive | NYC green-job grifter owes nearly $1M to stiffed students, lawsuit alleges: 'This ends now'

International Business Times

Rebel Creamery Files Bankruptcy After Van Leeuwen Wins $23 Million Ice Cream Lawsuit

The Hans India

Sebi mulls settlement overhaul; plans fast-track route for cases up to Rs 10Lakhs

The Verge

Amazon is trying to crush class action suits before they get started

International Business Times

Rebel Creamery Files For Chapter 11 Bankruptcy After Losing $23.8 Million Ice Cream Packaging Lawsuit

Complex

Charles Oakley’s MSG Lawsuit Tossed Again — But He Says It’s Not Over

Ary News

Rebel Creamery files for bankruptcy protection

Mint

Health Insurance claims: 6 common reasons insurers deduct money from your settlement

Mathrubhumi English

Awarded ₹6.91 lakh, paid ₹2 crore: Supplyco caught in legal trouble over an unusual settlement

Koreajoongangdaily Joins News

SK Group Chairman Chey Tae-won appeals $666 million divorce settlement

Mint

How to decode your health insurance claim settlement letter

Page Six

Selena Gomez’s lawyer gives scathing response to ‘fraud’ lawsuit against singer and her mom