Payment Towards Corporate Guarantee Settlement Allowable as Deductible Business Expenditure u/s 37(1): ITAT [Read Order]

Taxscan
The ITAT ruled that a payment for settling a corporate guarantee is deductible as a business expense under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act.

Summary

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) addressed whether a payment made towards settling a corporate guarantee could be considered a deductible business expenditure under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The case involved Escorts Limited, which provided a guarantee to a Korean supplier (L.S. Cables, Korea) for credit extended to its US subsidiary (Farmtrac North America LLC). When the subsidiary defaulted, the guarantee was invoked, leading to arbitration and a settlement of USD 7.17 million. Escorts claimed the settlement payment as a business expense, but the Assessing Officer (AO) and Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (CIT(A)) disallowed it, arguing it wasn’t exclusively for business purposes.

Escorts argued the guarantee was given in the ordinary course of business to support its subsidiary and promote its brand in the US. They cited precedents supporting the allowance of similar claims. The Revenue countered that a valid guarantee didn’t exist due to a lack of countersignature and questioned the expenditure’s connection to Escorts’ business, noting the subsidiary was only 75% owned.

The ITAT ruled in favor of Escorts, stating the guarantee’s validity was established through arbitration and High Court proceedings. The tribunal emphasized that the tax department shouldn’t second-guess business decisions and that once a guarantee is given, the resulting liability is a legitimate business obligation. Consequently, the disallowance of Rs. 47.64 crores was reversed, allowing Escorts to deduct the settlement payment as a business expense.

(Source:Taxscan)

Crypto News

Ledger sued for $500M over alleged data breach and crypto theft

Chicago Tribune

Judge blocks President Trump’s new bid to curb birthright citizenship, citing Supreme Court precedent

Deadline

NY Times Rips Trump's DOJ For Backing AI Companies In Class Action Suit

The Boston Globe

Musicians sue AI music company Suno for imitating their voices

WIS10

Federal class-action lawsuit filed against Flock Safety

The Guardian

Uber drivers launch European class action over ‘soulless’ and ‘scary’ AI algorithm

Koreajoongangdaily Joins News

Coupang data breach lawsuit faces U.S. court jurisdiction battle

Insurance Journal

Apple to Pay Virginia Employee $150K in Religious Accommodation Settlement

Newswise

FTC Lawsuit Against Amazon Raises Questions About Advertising Costs, Competition and Consumer Impact: UMD Expert Available | Newswise

Wtvc

Whistleblower says Meta’s $18B settlement falls short of protecting kids’ lives

Upper Michigan's Source

Marquette County Board forms opioid task force to refine settlement disbursement

The Hollywood Reporter

Country Star Jason Isbell...

Billboard

Jason Isbell Files Class Action Lawsuit Claiming Suno Coded AI to ‘Extract Musicians’ Identities’

Fortune

Once a champion for physical media, Sony is now telling PlayStation customers they don’t actually own the digital video games they paid $70 for | Fortune

The Aryavarth Express - Your Own English Daily New

Subhash Chandra Insolvency: ₹22,006 Crore Claims vs ₹6.5 Crore Settlement