Payment Towards Corporate Guarantee Settlement Allowable as Deductible Business Expenditure u/s 37(1): ITAT [Read Order]

Taxscan
The ITAT ruled that a payment for settling a corporate guarantee is deductible as a business expense under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act.

Summary

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) addressed whether a payment made towards settling a corporate guarantee could be considered a deductible business expenditure under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The case involved Escorts Limited, which provided a guarantee to a Korean supplier (L.S. Cables, Korea) for credit extended to its US subsidiary (Farmtrac North America LLC). When the subsidiary defaulted, the guarantee was invoked, leading to arbitration and a settlement of USD 7.17 million. Escorts claimed the settlement payment as a business expense, but the Assessing Officer (AO) and Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (CIT(A)) disallowed it, arguing it wasn’t exclusively for business purposes.

Escorts argued the guarantee was given in the ordinary course of business to support its subsidiary and promote its brand in the US. They cited precedents supporting the allowance of similar claims. The Revenue countered that a valid guarantee didn’t exist due to a lack of countersignature and questioned the expenditure’s connection to Escorts’ business, noting the subsidiary was only 75% owned.

The ITAT ruled in favor of Escorts, stating the guarantee’s validity was established through arbitration and High Court proceedings. The tribunal emphasized that the tax department shouldn’t second-guess business decisions and that once a guarantee is given, the resulting liability is a legitimate business obligation. Consequently, the disallowance of Rs. 47.64 crores was reversed, allowing Escorts to deduct the settlement payment as a business expense.

(Source:Taxscan)

USA TODAY

Disney sued over facial recognition at California theme parks

New York Post

Disneyland targeted in class-action lawsuit claiming new program is violating guests' privacy

Bangor Daily News

Journalists sue tech giants over 'stolen' voices for AI training

Devdiscourse

UPDATE 4-Takeda engaged in antitrust scheme to delay generic constipation drug, US jury finds

The Japan Times

Takeda engaged in antitrust scheme to delay generic constipation drug: U.S. jury

Devdiscourse

UPDATE 3-Japan's Takeda engaged in antitrust scheme to delay generic constipation drug, US jury finds

Santa Ana Orange County Register

Disneyland hit with $5 million lawsuit over use of facial recognition technology

Engadget

Disney Faces A Class Action Lawsuit Over Facial Recognition Tech

wdwnt.com

Class Action Lawsuit Over Facial Recognition Technology Filed Against The Walt Disney Company

Devdiscourse

Takeda Faces $885 Million Liability in Antitrust Verdict

New York Post

California shopper sues fashion retailer for too many early promo texts — now she wants every American to join her class action

The Boston Globe

State workers file class-action lawsuit against R.I. over new payroll system

Bloomberg Tax News

U.S. District Court Grants Preliminary Approval of Premium Tax Settlement Class

Ventura County Star

Fidelity settlement payouts up to $5K, do Californians get a cut?

Engadget

Sony Hit With A Class Action Lawsuit For Allegedly Profiting From Tariff-Related Price Hikes