NCLAT Refuses to Stay ₹2,500 Cr Class Action Suit Against Jindal Poly Films

Outlook Business
The NCLAT upheld the NCLT's decision to allow a ₹2,500 crore class action suit against Jindal Poly Films regarding alleged fraudulent transactions.

Summary

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has rejected a plea to stay a class action lawsuit against Jindal Poly Films Limited, upholding the National Company Law Tribunal’s (NCLT) earlier decision to admit the case. The suit, brought by shareholders holding a 4.99% stake, alleges that promoter-linked transactions between FY14 and FY22 caused a financial loss of ₹2,518.45 crore to the company and its public shareholders. These transactions include investments in group firms, trade advances, and the sale of a subsidiary’s stake at discounted values.

Jindal Poly Films argued that the transactions were completed in the past and therefore outside the scope of Section 245 of the Companies Act, 2013, which addresses acts prejudicial to shareholder interests. They also contended that the NCLT did not adequately assess the requirements for admitting the class action. However, the NCLAT noted investigations by SEBI and the Directorate of Enforcement suggest potential fraudulent acts and that the company’s affairs may have been conducted prejudicially.

The NCLT had previously found that the petitioners met the minimum threshold for bringing the suit and had acted in good faith. The NCLAT’s decision allows the case to proceed, with the NCLT set to begin hearing the matter. Jindal Poly Films maintains that all business decisions were made with commercial wisdom and proper approvals, and that the NCLAT’s decision does not address the merits of the case.

(Source:Outlook Business)

The Motley Fool Australia

KFC owner Collins Foods shares sliding today on class action news

PerthNow

Qantas makes $105m settlement in COVID-19 flight credit class action

Fox Business

Costco sued by customer seeking refunds for tariff payments

TechRadar

PlayStation users in the UK could be collectively awarded billions in compensation for 'excessive and unfair' PlayStation Store charges in class-action lawsuit against Sony

Polygon

Sony hit with $2.67 billion lawsuit over 'excessive and unfair' digital download charges

TechCrunch

A writer is suing Grammarly for turning her and other authors into ‘AI editors’ without consent

New York Post

Costco shopper sues retailer for tariff refunds after Trump import taxes overruled

Siliconrepublic.com

Grammarly drops AI impersonation tool after class action lawsuit

International Business Times

Grammarly Faces $5M Lawsuit After AI 'Expert Review' Feature Used Writers' Names Without Permission

Gizmodo

Grammarly Allegedly ‘Misappropriated’ Names of Journalists, Says Class Action Suit

BayToday

Ontario Superior Court approves class-action suit against Barrick

WIRED

Grammarly Is Facing a Class Action Lawsuit Over Its AI ‘Expert Review’ Feature

Global News

Privacy watchdog ‘monitoring’ U.S. auto insurance phone tracking lawsuit

Ventura County Star

California Tinder users may qualify for payments in $60.5M settlement

Raleigh News & Observer

NC attorney general blasts antitrust settlement over Ticketmaster practices