Jury finds Elon Musk misled investors during Twitter purchase, absolves him of some fraud claims

Santa Rosa Press Democrat
A jury found Elon Musk liable for misleading investors about Twitter’s stock price before his acquisition, awarding $2.6 billion in damages, but cleared him of actively scheming to defraud.

Summary

A jury in San Francisco has determined that Elon Musk is liable for defrauding investors by deliberately driving down Twitter’s stock price in the months leading up to his $44 billion acquisition of the company in 2022. The civil trial centered on whether Musk’s tweets and podcast comments in May 2022 intentionally misled shareholders, causing them to sell their shares at a loss. While the jury found Musk liable for misleading investors with two specific tweets – including one stating the deal was “temporarily on hold” – they absolved him of intentionally scheming to defraud investors and found no wrongdoing in a statement made on a podcast.

The jury awarded shareholders approximately $2.1 billion in stock damages and $500 million in options. Plaintiffs’ attorney Joseph Cotchett hailed the verdict as a victory for investors and a demonstration that even wealthy individuals are subject to the law. Musk’s legal team, however, plans to appeal, citing previous victories and characterizing the verdict as a “bump in the road.”

The trial heavily focused on Musk’s claims regarding the number of bot accounts on Twitter, which he alleged were significantly higher than the 5% disclosed by the company. Musk used this claim as justification for attempting to back out of the purchase agreement, ultimately leading to a court battle in Delaware before he agreed to proceed with the original deal. The core question was whether Musk’s statements were a deliberate attempt to depress Twitter’s share price, and while the jury found misleading statements were made, they did not find evidence of a deliberate scheme.

(Source:Santa Rosa Press Democrat)

Crypto News

Ledger sued for $500M over alleged data breach and crypto theft

Chicago Tribune

Judge blocks President Trump’s new bid to curb birthright citizenship, citing Supreme Court precedent

Deadline

NY Times Rips Trump's DOJ For Backing AI Companies In Class Action Suit

The Boston Globe

Musicians sue AI music company Suno for imitating their voices

WIS10

Federal class-action lawsuit filed against Flock Safety

The Guardian

Uber drivers launch European class action over ‘soulless’ and ‘scary’ AI algorithm

Koreajoongangdaily Joins News

Coupang data breach lawsuit faces U.S. court jurisdiction battle

Insurance Journal

Apple to Pay Virginia Employee $150K in Religious Accommodation Settlement

Newswise

FTC Lawsuit Against Amazon Raises Questions About Advertising Costs, Competition and Consumer Impact: UMD Expert Available | Newswise

Wtvc

Whistleblower says Meta’s $18B settlement falls short of protecting kids’ lives

Upper Michigan's Source

Marquette County Board forms opioid task force to refine settlement disbursement

The Hollywood Reporter

Country Star Jason Isbell...

Billboard

Jason Isbell Files Class Action Lawsuit Claiming Suno Coded AI to ‘Extract Musicians’ Identities’

Fortune

Once a champion for physical media, Sony is now telling PlayStation customers they don’t actually own the digital video games they paid $70 for | Fortune

The Aryavarth Express - Your Own English Daily New

Subhash Chandra Insolvency: ₹22,006 Crore Claims vs ₹6.5 Crore Settlement