Jury finds Elon Musk misled investors during Twitter purchase, absolves him of some fraud claims

The Philadelphia Inquirer
A jury found Elon Musk liable for misleading investors about Twitter's bot count before his acquisition, but cleared him of intentionally scheming to defraud them.

Summary

A San Francisco jury has determined that Elon Musk misled investors regarding Twitter’s (now X) stock price in the months leading up to his $44 billion acquisition in 2022. The civil trial revolved around claims that Musk’s tweets and podcast comments in May 2022 intentionally defrauded shareholders who sold their stock based on his statements. While the jury found Musk liable for misleading investors with two specific tweets – including one stating the deal was “temporarily on hold” – they did not find evidence of intentional fraud or a “scheme” to mislead, absolving him of some allegations related to a podcast statement.

The core of the dispute centered on Musk’s assertions about the prevalence of bot accounts on Twitter. He claimed the platform had a significantly higher percentage of fake and spam accounts than the 5% disclosed in regulatory filings, using this as justification to initially attempt to withdraw from the purchase agreement. Twitter subsequently sued to enforce the original deal, but Musk ultimately reversed course and completed the acquisition.

The financial implications of the verdict remain unclear as it is a class-action lawsuit, but damages are expected to reach billions of dollars, distributed among thousands of shareholders, including institutional investors. The jury awarded shareholders between $3 and $8 per stock per day. Despite the potential payout, Musk’s current net worth, estimated at $814 billion, largely tied to Tesla shares, suggests the financial impact will be manageable.

(Source:The Philadelphia Inquirer)

Crypto News

Ledger sued for $500M over alleged data breach and crypto theft

Chicago Tribune

Judge blocks President Trump’s new bid to curb birthright citizenship, citing Supreme Court precedent

Deadline

NY Times Rips Trump's DOJ For Backing AI Companies In Class Action Suit

The Boston Globe

Musicians sue AI music company Suno for imitating their voices

WIS10

Federal class-action lawsuit filed against Flock Safety

The Guardian

Uber drivers launch European class action over ‘soulless’ and ‘scary’ AI algorithm

Koreajoongangdaily Joins News

Coupang data breach lawsuit faces U.S. court jurisdiction battle

Insurance Journal

Apple to Pay Virginia Employee $150K in Religious Accommodation Settlement

Newswise

FTC Lawsuit Against Amazon Raises Questions About Advertising Costs, Competition and Consumer Impact: UMD Expert Available | Newswise

Wtvc

Whistleblower says Meta’s $18B settlement falls short of protecting kids’ lives

Upper Michigan's Source

Marquette County Board forms opioid task force to refine settlement disbursement

The Hollywood Reporter

Country Star Jason Isbell...

Billboard

Jason Isbell Files Class Action Lawsuit Claiming Suno Coded AI to ‘Extract Musicians’ Identities’

Fortune

Once a champion for physical media, Sony is now telling PlayStation customers they don’t actually own the digital video games they paid $70 for | Fortune

The Aryavarth Express - Your Own English Daily New

Subhash Chandra Insolvency: ₹22,006 Crore Claims vs ₹6.5 Crore Settlement