A new lawsuit alleges DHS illegally tracked and intimidated observers

NPR
A lawsuit alleges DHS unlawfully retaliated against observers of immigration enforcement by collecting their data and falsely labeling them 'domestic terrorists'.

Summary

A new federal lawsuit accuses the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and its sub-agencies of violating the First Amendment rights of individuals observing and recording federal immigration enforcement operations. Plaintiffs, including social worker Colleen Fagan and Portland resident Elinor Hilton, claim agents are unconstitutionally gathering their personal information, scanning their faces, and labeling them as “domestic terrorists” for peacefully observing lawful activities. DHS denies the existence of a “domestic terrorist” database but admits to monitoring and investigating threats against its officers.

The lawsuit details instances where agents scanned observers’ faces and license plates, and even followed them home to intimidate them. Former ICE advisor Tom Homan previously advocated for a database of individuals who impede ICE operations, while DHS officials have broadened the definition of “doxing” to include simply filming and posting photos of agents online.

The plaintiffs seek a court order to stop DHS from collecting records on observers, cease retaliatory actions, and expunge any existing records. The lawsuit argues that DHS is either deliberately lying about the existence of databases or unlawfully intimidating observers by falsely claiming they are being added to watchlists, and aims to protect the rights of peaceful dissent and observation.

(Source:NPR)

The Motley Fool Australia

KFC owner Collins Foods shares sliding today on class action news

PerthNow

Qantas makes $105m settlement in COVID-19 flight credit class action

Fox Business

Costco sued by customer seeking refunds for tariff payments

TechRadar

PlayStation users in the UK could be collectively awarded billions in compensation for 'excessive and unfair' PlayStation Store charges in class-action lawsuit against Sony

Polygon

Sony hit with $2.67 billion lawsuit over 'excessive and unfair' digital download charges

TechCrunch

A writer is suing Grammarly for turning her and other authors into ‘AI editors’ without consent

New York Post

Costco shopper sues retailer for tariff refunds after Trump import taxes overruled

Siliconrepublic.com

Grammarly drops AI impersonation tool after class action lawsuit

International Business Times

Grammarly Faces $5M Lawsuit After AI 'Expert Review' Feature Used Writers' Names Without Permission

Gizmodo

Grammarly Allegedly ‘Misappropriated’ Names of Journalists, Says Class Action Suit

BayToday

Ontario Superior Court approves class-action suit against Barrick

WIRED

Grammarly Is Facing a Class Action Lawsuit Over Its AI ‘Expert Review’ Feature

Global News

Privacy watchdog ‘monitoring’ U.S. auto insurance phone tracking lawsuit

Ventura County Star

California Tinder users may qualify for payments in $60.5M settlement

Raleigh News & Observer

NC attorney general blasts antitrust settlement over Ticketmaster practices