Federal Court rules in favor of Utah, other states, in lawsuit surrounding energy efficiency standards

Salt Lake City
A federal court sided with Utah and other states in a lawsuit challenging new energy efficiency standards for housing, deeming the standards unlawful.

Summary

A federal court has ruled in favor of Utah, 15 other states, and the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) in their lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) regarding new energy efficiency standards for housing construction. The lawsuit stemmed from a 2024 determination by HUD and USDA requiring certain homes to follow the 2021 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC), a move the plaintiffs argued would increase the cost of new homes by $9,600 to $21,400. They contended this violated the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act, intended to make housing more affordable. The court found that the agencies’ Final Determination supporting the IECC codes was unlawful under the Administrative Procedure Act, as the Act only authorizes agencies to update energy efficiency standards once—which HUD and USDA had already done in 2015. The court also noted the agencies’ own findings indicated a 1.5 percent reduction in the availability of new homes due to the standards. While the court dismissed the claim that delegating power to private code bodies was a violation, it ultimately vacated the agencies’ Final Determination, meaning the new standards are not currently enforceable. NAHB Chairman Bill Owens stated the ruling prevents “new energy code mandates that will raise construction costs and limit access to federal mortgage programs,” and Utah Attorney General Derek Brown called it “a victory for the Constitution and for every Utah family who dreams of owning a home.”

(Source:Salt Lake City)

Crypto News

Ledger sued for $500M over alleged data breach and crypto theft

Chicago Tribune

Judge blocks President Trump’s new bid to curb birthright citizenship, citing Supreme Court precedent

Deadline

NY Times Rips Trump's DOJ For Backing AI Companies In Class Action Suit

The Boston Globe

Musicians sue AI music company Suno for imitating their voices

WIS10

Federal class-action lawsuit filed against Flock Safety

The Guardian

Uber drivers launch European class action over ‘soulless’ and ‘scary’ AI algorithm

Koreajoongangdaily Joins News

Coupang data breach lawsuit faces U.S. court jurisdiction battle

Insurance Journal

Apple to Pay Virginia Employee $150K in Religious Accommodation Settlement

Newswise

FTC Lawsuit Against Amazon Raises Questions About Advertising Costs, Competition and Consumer Impact: UMD Expert Available | Newswise

Wtvc

Whistleblower says Meta’s $18B settlement falls short of protecting kids’ lives

Upper Michigan's Source

Marquette County Board forms opioid task force to refine settlement disbursement

The Hollywood Reporter

Country Star Jason Isbell...

Billboard

Jason Isbell Files Class Action Lawsuit Claiming Suno Coded AI to ‘Extract Musicians’ Identities’

Fortune

Once a champion for physical media, Sony is now telling PlayStation customers they don’t actually own the digital video games they paid $70 for | Fortune

The Aryavarth Express - Your Own English Daily New

Subhash Chandra Insolvency: ₹22,006 Crore Claims vs ₹6.5 Crore Settlement