Visa, Mastercard Win Key Court Victory in $38bn Swipe-Fee Settlement, but Battle Over Card Market Power Is Far From Over

Tekedia
A U.S. judge approved a revised $38 billion settlement between merchants and Visa and Mastercard, reducing swipe fees and giving merchants more flexibility, though critics argue the deal does not fully address market power concerns.

Summary

A U.S. federal judge has granted preliminary approval to a revised $38 billion settlement between merchants and payment giants Visa and Mastercard, marking a major milestone in a long-running antitrust dispute. The decision by U.S. District Judge Brian Cogan moves the agreement closer to final approval and could reshape how merchants accept card payments. The case dates back to 2005, when merchants accused Visa, Mastercard, and major issuing banks of conspiring to inflate interchange fees. The revised agreement emerged after an earlier $30 billion settlement was rejected in 2024. Under the agreement, Visa and Mastercard will reduce interchange fees by 0.1 percentage point for five years, cap standard consumer card rates at 1.25% for eight years, and give merchants broader authority to impose surcharges and decide which card types to accept. The final provision weakens the longstanding "Honor All Cards" framework. The settlement could have important implications for the lucrative rewards-card business, giving retailers more leverage to reject certain categories of cards. However, opposition from major retailers remains strong, with groups including the National Retail Federation arguing that the settlement still leaves fundamental competitive issues unresolved. Merchants will still be unable to selectively reject cards issued by specific banks. According to data, Visa and Mastercard swipe fees reached approximately $118.8 billion in 2025. The plaintiffs' economic experts estimate that the agreement could save merchants roughly $38 billion through 2031 and generate broader economic benefits worth as much as $224 billion. Although the agreement introduces greater flexibility for merchants, it stops short of fundamentally restructuring the card-payment market. The broader antitrust debate is unlikely to disappear as regulators globally scrutinize payment fees and network power.

(Source:Tekedia)

The News International

Canadians who bought beef products may qualify for class action payout

Fox Business

Costco hit with lawsuit alleging protein powder sold in stores contains 'dangerous' levels of lead, arsenic

SooToday

$8-million settlement proposed in national beef price-fixing class-action

The News International

Costco faces class action over alleged heavy metals in Orgain protein supplements

scanx.trade

GRAL investors face August 4 deadline in Grail securities lawsuit

Google News

State AGs finalizing antitrust lawsuit over Paramount–Warner Bros. Discovery merger

Chicago Suntimes

Cash App parent company agrees to $45 million settlement with Illinois, 44 other states - Chicago Sun-Times

Headtopics

Mavericks owners froze Mark Cuban out of business opportunities in proposed arena move, lawsuit claims

The Economic Times

CBDT exempts NCCL settlement fund from tax

Livemint

Microsoft's $7.3 billion AI data centre sued over ‘freight train-like’ non-stop noise

Hoodline

Wegmans Faces Landlord Lawsuit Over $479K at Fenton

Https://www.kswo.com

Drummond files lawsuit against Allstate Insurance

Patch

Fort Worth Announces Nuisance Abatement Lawsuit Against Central Motel

Cfotech Australia

SS&C to add digital cash settlement for tokenised funds

Headtopics

Anchorage Secures $191.3 Million Federal Settlement for Port of Alaska Modernization