Visa, Mastercard Win Key Court Victory in $38bn Swipe-Fee Settlement, but Battle Over Card Market Power Is Far From Over

Tekedia
A U.S. judge approved a revised $38 billion settlement between merchants and Visa and Mastercard, reducing swipe fees and giving merchants more flexibility, though critics argue the deal does not fully address market power concerns.

Summary

A U.S. federal judge has granted preliminary approval to a revised $38 billion settlement between merchants and payment giants Visa and Mastercard, marking a major milestone in a long-running antitrust dispute. The decision by U.S. District Judge Brian Cogan moves the agreement closer to final approval and could reshape how merchants accept card payments. The case dates back to 2005, when merchants accused Visa, Mastercard, and major issuing banks of conspiring to inflate interchange fees. The revised agreement emerged after an earlier $30 billion settlement was rejected in 2024. Under the agreement, Visa and Mastercard will reduce interchange fees by 0.1 percentage point for five years, cap standard consumer card rates at 1.25% for eight years, and give merchants broader authority to impose surcharges and decide which card types to accept. The final provision weakens the longstanding "Honor All Cards" framework. The settlement could have important implications for the lucrative rewards-card business, giving retailers more leverage to reject certain categories of cards. However, opposition from major retailers remains strong, with groups including the National Retail Federation arguing that the settlement still leaves fundamental competitive issues unresolved. Merchants will still be unable to selectively reject cards issued by specific banks. According to data, Visa and Mastercard swipe fees reached approximately $118.8 billion in 2025. The plaintiffs' economic experts estimate that the agreement could save merchants roughly $38 billion through 2031 and generate broader economic benefits worth as much as $224 billion. Although the agreement introduces greater flexibility for merchants, it stops short of fundamentally restructuring the card-payment market. The broader antitrust debate is unlikely to disappear as regulators globally scrutinize payment fees and network power.

(Source:Tekedia)

Crypto News

Ledger sued for $500M over alleged data breach and crypto theft

Chicago Tribune

Judge blocks President Trump’s new bid to curb birthright citizenship, citing Supreme Court precedent

Deadline

NY Times Rips Trump's DOJ For Backing AI Companies In Class Action Suit

The Boston Globe

Musicians sue AI music company Suno for imitating their voices

WIS10

Federal class-action lawsuit filed against Flock Safety

The Guardian

Uber drivers launch European class action over ‘soulless’ and ‘scary’ AI algorithm

Koreajoongangdaily Joins News

Coupang data breach lawsuit faces U.S. court jurisdiction battle

Insurance Journal

Apple to Pay Virginia Employee $150K in Religious Accommodation Settlement

Newswise

FTC Lawsuit Against Amazon Raises Questions About Advertising Costs, Competition and Consumer Impact: UMD Expert Available | Newswise

Wtvc

Whistleblower says Meta’s $18B settlement falls short of protecting kids’ lives

Upper Michigan's Source

Marquette County Board forms opioid task force to refine settlement disbursement

The Hollywood Reporter

Country Star Jason Isbell...

Billboard

Jason Isbell Files Class Action Lawsuit Claiming Suno Coded AI to ‘Extract Musicians’ Identities’

Fortune

Once a champion for physical media, Sony is now telling PlayStation customers they don’t actually own the digital video games they paid $70 for | Fortune

The Aryavarth Express - Your Own English Daily New

Subhash Chandra Insolvency: ₹22,006 Crore Claims vs ₹6.5 Crore Settlement