Conservation Groups Issue Reply to EPA in West Virginia Regional Haze Lawsuit

Clean Technica
Conservation groups filed a reply defending their lawsuit against EPA’s approval of West Virginia’s haze plan, warning it weakens Clean Air Act protections and risks air quality in parks and wilderness.

Summary

A coalition of conservation groups — the National Parks Conservation Association, Sierra Club, and Earthjustice — filed a response in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit defending their lawsuit against the Environmental Protection Agency’s approval of West Virginia’s Regional Haze State Implementation Plan. The groups argue that EPA’s approval, based on a Trump-era policy change, allows West Virginia to bypass the Clean Air Act’s core requirement for reasonable progress in reducing visibility-impairing air pollution in national parks and wilderness areas. They contend the plan is unlawful because it fails to require additional controls for the state’s highest-polluting coal plants, despite the availability of affordable upgrades to reduce sulfur dioxide emissions that harm health and degrade visibility. If the court does not grant the groups’ petition, treasured sites such as Dolly Sods and Otter Creek Wilderness areas in West Virginia, as well as Shenandoah, Mammoth Cave, and Great Smoky Mountains National Parks, could face increased risks of poor air quality. The lawsuit, first filed in September 2025, marks the first legal challenge to the policy change, which the groups say rewrites the Clean Air Act and has already been used to propose approvals of inadequate haze plans in other states. Advocates emphasize that the EPA’s decision disregards decades of agency precedent and undermines protections for parks and downwind communities, while state and industry representatives argue the plan is sufficient.

(Source:Clean Technica)

Crypto News

Ledger sued for $500M over alleged data breach and crypto theft

Chicago Tribune

Judge blocks President Trump’s new bid to curb birthright citizenship, citing Supreme Court precedent

Deadline

NY Times Rips Trump's DOJ For Backing AI Companies In Class Action Suit

The Boston Globe

Musicians sue AI music company Suno for imitating their voices

WIS10

Federal class-action lawsuit filed against Flock Safety

The Guardian

Uber drivers launch European class action over ‘soulless’ and ‘scary’ AI algorithm

Koreajoongangdaily Joins News

Coupang data breach lawsuit faces U.S. court jurisdiction battle

Insurance Journal

Apple to Pay Virginia Employee $150K in Religious Accommodation Settlement

Newswise

FTC Lawsuit Against Amazon Raises Questions About Advertising Costs, Competition and Consumer Impact: UMD Expert Available | Newswise

Wtvc

Whistleblower says Meta’s $18B settlement falls short of protecting kids’ lives

Upper Michigan's Source

Marquette County Board forms opioid task force to refine settlement disbursement

The Hollywood Reporter

Country Star Jason Isbell...

Billboard

Jason Isbell Files Class Action Lawsuit Claiming Suno Coded AI to ‘Extract Musicians’ Identities’

Fortune

Once a champion for physical media, Sony is now telling PlayStation customers they don’t actually own the digital video games they paid $70 for | Fortune

The Aryavarth Express - Your Own English Daily New

Subhash Chandra Insolvency: ₹22,006 Crore Claims vs ₹6.5 Crore Settlement