Wantable faces class action lawsuit over unlawful subscription renewals in California
A class action lawsuit alleges Wantable failed to properly disclose automatic renewal terms, leading to unexpected charges for California customers.Summary
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Wantable Inc. by plaintiff Rebeka Rodriguez, alleging violations of California’s Automatic Renewal Law. Rodriguez claims she was charged over $350 after signing up for a $21.95 subscription to Wantable’s Sleep & Body Edit service, due to automatically renewing subscriptions she was unaware of. The lawsuit asserts that Wantable did not clearly disclose the automatic renewal terms on its website or in post-transaction emails, violating the state’s law requiring “clear and conspicuous” disclosures. Specifically, the complaint states the checkout page failed to describe the cancellation policy as required.
Rodriguez seeks to represent a class of California residents who were similarly charged for unwanted renewals. She is requesting damages, restitution, and an injunction to prevent Wantable from continuing these practices. The lawsuit also alleges violations of California’s Consumers Legal Remedies Act, Unfair Competition Law, and False Advertising Law, claiming Wantable intentionally misled customers.
This case follows a similar lawsuit against Surfshark regarding automatically renewing subscriptions. The case is Rodriguez v. Wantable Inc., Case No. 3:25-cv-02267, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California.
(Source：Class Action Lawsuits)